Welcome to another Sunday Morning Showdown! This week, we’re not just bringing you any old battle; we’re pitting two heavyweights against each other: the brand-new Omega Speedmaster Professional in steel and gold versus the classic two-tone clone Rolex Daytona. Let’s see which watch emerges as the Fratelli favorite. With Robert-Jan backing the Speedmaster and Jorg supporting the Daytona, the decision is in your hands!
Omega recently unveiled two versions of its iconic Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch in steel and gold. These aren’t the first two-tone Speedmasters, but they mark the return of regular-production models in this material mix since the ’80s. On the other hand, Rolex has long been synonymous with two-tone luxury, and their steel and yellow gold Daytona joined the lineup last year. So, which one will reign supreme? Let’s delve into the arguments from Robert-Jan and Jorg before you make your choice.
Recap from Last Week
Before we dive into our writers’ insights, let’s briefly revisit last week’s contest. In a tight battle between the Tudor Pelagos FXD Alinghi Red Bull Racing Edition and the Panerai Submersible QuarantaQuattro Luna Rossa Ti-Ceramic, the Tudor emerged victorious with 52% of the votes. Despite the Panerai’s higher price tag, many were swayed by its aesthetic appeal. This goes to show that looks play a significant role in watch preferences, a factor we’ll consider in this showdown as well.
Jorg’s Perspective: Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Ref. 126503
Admittedly, I face an uphill battle here. In a previous clash between these watches in stainless steel, the Speedmaster triumphed convincingly. However, I believe there’s merit in arguing for the two-tone Rolex Daytona’s superiority. While the Daytona has its flaws, I find its steel and gold combination more aesthetically pleasing. Unlike the Moonwatch, which feels awkward in this material mix, the Daytona exudes familiarity and comfort, especially with a black or gold dial.
The contrast between steel and gold has long been fake Rolex’s forte, seamlessly blending luxury with sportiness across their lineup. However, the steel and gold Speedmaster fails to evoke the same appeal. The Sedna Gold variant, in particular, feels disjointed, lacking the harmony found in Rolex’s designs. Despite its imperfections, the Daytona, especially with a black dial, stands out as the better-looking option to me.
In the end, aesthetics matter, and the Daytona’s timeless allure surpasses the Speedmaster’s quirks. While my choice may differ from the norm, sometimes opting for what looks and feels right trumps the obvious pick. Until Omega refines its two-tone offerings, I stand by my preference for the Daytona.
Robert-Jan’s Perspective: Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch
It’s intriguing that Jorg defends the replica Rolex Daytona in two-tone while offering scant praise beyond its familiarity. For many, the allure of the Daytona lies more in its brand name than its design. Conversely, I find the new steel and gold Speedmaster far more compelling, both aesthetically and historically.
The recent Speedmaster release pays homage to its 1980s two-tone predecessor, predating Rolex’s venture into this territory. Having worn the steel and Moonshine Gold variant extensively, I appreciate its visual appeal and modern innovations. The interplay of materials on the wrist brings joy – a crucial aspect of watch ownership.
While vintage Speedmasters offer nostalgia, the new models combine heritage with contemporary craftsmanship. The steel and gold Speedmaster’s versatility and charm make it a worthy everyday companion. As for aesthetics, the Speedmaster’s design surpasses the Daytona’s, offering a more distinctive and engaging experience.
Personal taste reigns supreme. Choose the watch that resonates with you and brings a smile to your face. While steel and gold watches may not suit everyone’s preferences, Omega’s latest additions to the Moonwatch collection offer compelling options for enthusiasts. Now, it’s your turn to cast your vote and share your thoughts!